If you know how bitcoin transactions works and what UTXO are, probably you prefer do your own coin selection manually based on the needs of a specific transaction. the Coins tab is hidden by default on Electrum). There are multiple goal you may want achieve with a coin selection strategy and there is no one strategy that solves all problems, so wallets adopt different strategies depending on their priorities but these strategy are meant for unskilled user or user that don't care these things (eg. Is there a disadvantage or risk to doing this? I'm thinking there mustīe, otherwise Electrum would just do it automatically No, you are right, if you wish focus more on fee minimization instead of privacy, you can achieve better result doing so manually than rely on the Electrum coin control policy. This looks to me as though I can make the same transaction and incur a Third, it penalizes change that is too big. Second, it penalizes change that is quite different to the sent amount. Tokugawa Shogunate Bu Japanese Gold Coins for Sale on eBay. Would come from reusing that address' remaining UTXOs. The shogunate diluted their gold coins with silver instead of a baser metal like copper, leading to the many electrum (gold-silver) issues of the late Tokugawa era. In the list below, the Keeper of the Department of Coins in the British Museum describes the specimens. 1 its inscription, which exists only in part on the examples in other cabinets, appears to be complete. Reduce blockchain UTXO bloat, and reduce future privacy loss that Arthur Bernard Cook, an inscribed electrum coin of the well-known ‘lion’ type is depicted in Fig. Information leakage about sender holdings.
Electrum coin ebay code#
This is from the Electrum source code and explain this choice: Attempts to better preserve user privacy.įirst, if any coin is spent from a user address, all coins are.Ĭompared to spending from other addresses to make up an amount, this reduces
I could understand needing two inputs to the transaction if x was more than the amount associated with each one of my two "output points", but it isn't.Įlectrum used both UTXO, even if only one was needed, to protect your privacy albeit at the expense of higher fee. Am I missing something? Is there a disadvantage or risk to doing this? I'm thinking there must be, otherwise Electrum would just do it automatically. This looks to me as though I can make the same transaction and incur a smaller fee by using "coin control". If I start to make the same payment, the "Advanced" dialog now only shows one input and the transaction size is 226 bytes. If I go to the Coins tab, right click on one of the two "output points" and choose "Spend", Electrum shows a green banner saying "Coin control active". If go to the Send tab and start to make a payment to an address, then click "Pay." and then "Advanced", I can see two inputs, which seem to correspond to the two "output points" in the Coins tab and show the same amounts. Both of these show an amount much larger than x BTC. Overall.1 mm x 32.My Electrum wallet shows two "output points" in the Coins tab (with the same address). Metal, gold (overall material) Measurements Turkey: İstanbul province, Istanbul Physical Description Reverse Text: M / θV / MANGHΛ / ΔECΠOTH Location Refer to eBay Return policy - eBay Return policy - opens in a new tab or window for more. A nice gold tone remains, small edge split. Mysia Cyzicus Perseus Stater NGC VF 4/3 countermark, die shift. Reverse Image: The Virgin stands, nimbate, on right wearing a pallium and maphorium, on left Manuel I, stands wearing divitision and loros and holding akakia in right hand they hold between them a patriarchal cross with small globus at base above: M- θV A nice gold tone remains, small edge split. Obverse Image: Christ sits on a backless throne, wearing a beard, nimbus cross, pallium, and colobium he raises his right hand in benediction and holds the book of Gospels in his left on either side of nimbus : IC - XC. One (1) electrum aspron trachy coin, Manuel I Comnenus
0 kommentar(er)
